Pursuing Justice

A Teaching American History Grant from the U.S. Department of Education
Welcome to Pursuing Justice Sign in | Join | Help
in Search

the tipping point

Last post 07-03-2008, 9:50 AM by Christopher Galvin. 1 replies.
Sort Posts: Previous Next
  •  07-02-2008, 10:57 PM 4220

    the tipping point

    First, a quick shout out to Rich for the good food and good times at the Skellig!  Good looking out.

    Again - another day of thoughtful lecture and discussion.  I appreciated Prof. Kryder's defense of the role of the "white authority structure" in the Civil Rights movement.  I must admit that I tend to negate this role when I approach the topic and emphasize more of the fact that the government only seemed to act when pushed by social movement actors.  I thought about this role again when Sen. Clinton made her comments earlier this year about the success of the civil rights movement being incumbent upon the actions of the executive branch (the statement that Prof. Baldwin brought up early in the day).  I was forced to reconsider how I approach the role of the power structure, because it is obviously clear that there would not have been the legislative successes of the movement without the assistance of the President and the Congress.  However, I have always contended, and will continue to contend, that the only reason why the actions were taken  by the white power structure was because of the idea that the actions / feelings / ideas in the civil rights movement had hit that critical juncture, a tipping point if you will, that forced the hand of the legislature and the executive.  From the constant agitation by African-Americans in the North and South throughout the 20th century, the actions of sympathetic whites, the fact that the US had played an important role in two wars to make the overseas world "safe for democracy" and was currently engaged in a "cold war" against an "oppressive" empire, there was really no way that anybody in official capacity at the federal level could make a cogent argument to support America's separate and unequal racial situation any longer, especially as the agitation increased in the 1950s and 1960s.  Take all of this with the post-colonial independence movements of the 1950s and 1960s and there was really no other direction that the leaders of the country could legitimately take.  So, I agree with Cindy when she said that President Kennedy didn't have to pound Gov. Barnett with the idea that the case for James Meredith was about bringing about a situation of racial equality and Barnett would have to take it or leave it, but if he did truly believe in the issue of racial equality that was at the heart of Meredith's claims, they would have found there way, in some way, in his discussion with Gov. Barnett, if not in word, at least in spirit.  That being said, the fact that Pres. Kennedy wasn't a very strong advocate for African-Americans should come as no surprise, because as a good politician, African-Americans still did not make up the Democratic base that later Democratic candidates would need to appeal to.  In the end, I guess all I am trying to say is that I will have to be better at trying to acknowledge the role of the power structure in the civil rights movement, as Prof. Kryder did a nice job of laying out the difficulty in making what could be considered revolutionary changes in a still hostile environment, but I will still contend that the only way that these actions were taken were because there was no other reasonable choice for the president to take.  One of the things I consider to support this is the lukewarm support the civil rights legislation has received since it has been passed and how steps have been taken, especially after 1980 to dismantle these advances.  I am not saying that things haven't gotten better since the 1960s, but, as I believe someone stated earlier, things aren't over yet.   I really appreciated the discussions today, especially because people had some very different interpretations of Kennedy's actions and motives - I liked hearning the different ideas.  Have a good long weekend!


    Chris Kurhajetz
    High School History
    Winchester High School
  •  07-03-2008, 9:50 AM 4277 in reply to 4220

    Re: the tipping point

    I wholeheartedly agree with your contention that the white power structure only endorsed civil rights legislation when they were forced to because of the social agitation by civil rights advocates. I think that the argument of McAdam's critical dynamic that Prof. Kryder provided shows how the civil rights movement brought America's system of racism and oppression out into the open. It was not the protests and demonstrations themselves that illustrated American hypocrisy, rather it was the reaction that these protests provoked from the white power structure (namely from the police powers in the South). By provoking violent reactions, both from government and civilian police powers (the Roving Racists), civil rights advocates were able to draw out the racism and brutality that was/is inherent in the system. To quote from Monty Python's The Holy Grail "Violence is inherent in the system!". It is the brutal use of police force against those striving for racial equality that disturbed white Americans(mostly in the north and west) at the time, which gave those unenfranchised civil rights advocates a voice in the American polity. Now legislators had to respond to growing portions of civil rights advocates within their own constituencies. So I agree with your point that civil rights legislation did not take place until legislators were pushed to the "tipping point".

    In regards to Kennedy, I think it was quite obvious that his actions were not driven by motives of racial equality. His tone throughout the telephone conversations suggested that this was an event that he would rather just sweep under the rug and not have to deal with. His only concern was that he, as the executive power, had to enact the court ruling. He should be commended for this and perhaps he did believe in civil rights, but not necessarily racial equality. I think that because of Kennedy's assassination he has become a mythological figure in American history, approaching the status of sainthood. The man was a flawed human being like the rest of us. Though I do not intend to take anything away from what Kennedy accomplished during his presidency, I believe that the civil rights movements was something he wold have rather have not dealt with. Therefore, he was not a true believer in racial equality. Have a great weekend everyone!

     

     


    Christopher P. Galvin
    Social Studies Dept.
    Marshfield High School
View as RSS news feed in XML